San Francisco residents will be getting
thousands of new neighbors in the next 30 years, and it's time to start
figuring out where they will live and work.
![]() |
Construction proceeds on the Foundry Square III
building in SoMa, which is seeing a boom
in housing and office space.
Photo: Liz Hafalia, The Chronicle
|
Between 2010 and 2040, the city will need 92,410
new housing units and 191,000 more jobs, said city Planning Director John Rahaim, numbers
well above San Francisco's current growth rate.
Combined with the Association of Bay Area
Governments' estimate that San Francisco's population will soar from the
current 812,000 to at least 964,000 by 2035, it's clear that great change is
ahead for the city.
"This (growth) is going to happen whether
we plan for it or not," Rahaim recently told the Planning Commission.
"The issue is where that development happens."
San Francisco, like other cities, is planning
for its future as part of the 2008 state law requiring communities to develop
plans that link prospective growth to improved transportation and greenhouse
gas reduction.
The Association of Bay Area Governments, which
is putting together the "One Bay Area" plan for the region's nine
counties and 101 towns and cities, has projected that by 2040 the Bay Area will
need 1.1 million more jobs and 660,000 new housing units to accommodate the
additional 2.1 million people who will move into the area.
What's the best way?
For San Francisco, handling its share of that
growth will require hard choices - and plenty of discussion - about what's best
for the city, its residents and its businesses. The city's small size and
existing development pattern make the job even tougher, Rahaim said.
Of the 19 major development projects already
moving ahead in the city, only two, Balboa Park Station and
Parkmerced, are in the western part of San Francisco.
"There's 20 percent of the city where 80
percent of the growth is happening," Rahaim said, and that's unlikely to
change in future years.
Some of the biggest development sites already
are set. The huge Hunters Point Shipyard project approved in 2010 is slated to
include 10,500 housing units and provide 10,000 new jobs. Treasure Island will
have 7,000 condos and apartments while
the Transbay Center now
under construction at First and Mission streets calls for high-rises with 4,500
homes and providing as many as 25,000 jobs.
Other projects are more nebulous. While plans
for the Central Corridor - generally bounded by Market, Second, Townsend and
Sixth streets - call for adding 8,500 housing units and 34,000 jobs by 2040,
few of the project details are concrete.
Coming up short
Even if all the major proposed projects turn out
exactly as advertised, which seldom happens when the economics of development
are involved, San Francisco will still be about 20,000 homes and 50,000 jobs
short of what ABAG projects as the city's share of the Bay Area's growth.
For the city to meet these goals, the focus must
be on increasingly dense development south of Market Street, a transit-rich area
where much of San Francisco's dwindling supply of buildable land
is located.
"There's going to have to be more
density," said Tomiquia Moss,
community planning director for the San Francisco Planning and
Urban Research Association, a local good-government organization.
"The Central Corridor can absorb most or all of the projected
job growth."
But adding the amount of high-rise construction
needed to house a new wave of workers could destroy the community feeling that
has brought so many people, workers and residents alike, to SoMa in the first
place, especially if those anticipated workers never show up, said John Elberling,
president of Tenants and Owners Development Corporation,
a community development group that owns eight South of Market
residential buildings.
"The city has rose-colored glasses
on," he said. The city's projected need for new office space "is far
too optimistic; it's magical thinking."
They keep coming
But the continuing migration of companies and
their workers into San Francisco is a trend that doesn't seem to be slowing,
Rahaim said.
"Companies are looking less at suburban
campuses," he said. Their workers increasingly want "transit-served
urban environments with a variety of options and a high quality
of life."
Business development won't be the only source of
the city's growing pains. A continuing influx of workers and residents will
boost the need for everything from parks and streetlights to buses and
sewer lines.
"Is the city physically capable of growing
its roads and transit, its infrastructure?" asked Planning Commissioner Kathrin Moore.
"What's the ultimate carrying capacity of the city?"
Problem solving
![]() |
Part of the Hunters Point Shipyard redevelopment project is
seen with Candlestick Park in the background in San Francisco.
Photo: Lea Suzuki, The Chronicle
|
To Rahaim and other city officials, planned,
careful development itself will solve many of those problems, with needed fixes
to problems caused by new construction and population growth dealt with before
those buildings and developments are approved.
"The transit center, for example, adds 11
acres of open space that doesn't exist now," Rahaim said.
Not all growth-related problems have simple
solutions. San Francisco in 2040 will be a much more crowded city than it is
today, with the inevitable concerns and troubles that will bring.
![]() |
Lennar Corp.'s proposed initial construction
Photo: Lennar Corp.at the Hunters Point Shipyard. |
Wishing won't make that future go away, said
Commissioner Gwyneth Borden.
"Whether we like it or not, we can't stop
people from moving to San Francisco," Borden said. "So we have to
plan for it."
Article & Photos Sourced From: www.sfgate.com
John Wildermuth is
a San Francisco Chronicle staff
writer. E-mail: jwildermuth@sfchronicle.com
No comments:
Post a Comment